Looking for help with a Composite Chart

[ZenHaltija]

Hello, I haven't been on in a while but I'm new with astrology and I was wondering if I could get some feedback.

I was just wondering if this chart seemed unusual at all.. or if anyone could point anything out important to me.. Do these two people seem to be "soul mates" - for lack of a better word, or have some kind of karmic relationship?



If any extra information is needed I will respond as soon as I can..

Thanks!

[Evard]

Korean common pre-father new Mother chart same love oblique newest
faus maderna reason not any Cancerian and not any Aquarian new~et,
Alchemy proper pre-Cancer illness not distrust implacaden autra child..

Double Aquarian (Aquaran) alchemy disorder common reason childless
father and the role ,. Not any end year promote actual pateirn Peace ^.

I will be kind and say the child was father aherent.. and the mistaken %
imposa tri-doubal non Cancerian path reason evolah oblique was Child#
Peace and not the role tri nomoen noted at 22 Virgo sub-B Central Pana.

If that makes any sense at all.. It's what I see. Thanks . . Childless. aum.

Evard., the likes of Man was not man nor fem.. it was epitome~ ema aem.

[ZenHaltija]

I feel very awful for saying this but I did not understand any of that..  :-/ Would you mind elaborating a little bit? I'm sorry.

[Evard]

It was technical jargon.. I could get uh in a problem review when I talk the way I did.

The Pisces was Leo common new un-ideal reason Cancer was not included with future
child base about attracted maternal multi-chart and the Sun oppose was not reason ::
2 Wave Zodiac and Cancerian kinda Yin-Yang symbol were not included with charten..

So the common phrase un-included was either occluded or negated major.. <sigh> OK
If the site chart did not include any reading at all in 2 signs primary and another sign...
with 2 Wave symbol Zodiac,. it was not the Maternal thought about new sign other than
reasonable Cancerian and the role mid locality at the sun or planet (orb) symbol at aum
middle of wheel was on fact recognizable as the shape drawn by the chart outside wheel.

Tell me if I did explain at all. &nbsp;Otherwise I was tired and gave you a technical thought.

Evard .. overdid it. &nbsp; &nbsp;AM aste~ &nbsp; aomen