Aura pics
Moderators: eye_of_tiger, shalimar123
WOW!! How very generous of you FOA, Thank you so much. I'll grab a photo and send it to you in the next day or so. I just had some portraits done with Libby and I so will it matter if she's in the photo with me? It would be interesting given we're both virgo's if our auras are similar. I already see so much of me in her and she's only 2 (well this week on Thursday). It's scary! lol
Thanks again Flight of Angelwings...you truly are an Angel.
Peace, love and light to you.
Thanks again Flight of Angelwings...you truly are an Angel.
Peace, love and light to you.
O O
oo
**___**
oo
**___**
- flight _of_angelwings
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:32 am
- Location: NSW Australia
No she can be in the photo too. It will more than likely bond your auras to some degree if you would like one based soely on you then one of you alone is best but this can be a mum daughter thing too which is nice.
I dont mind offering usually I charge for these types of readings so I dont offer most of my services on here but your post had a particular calling to it and just lately I have been very much drawn to some certain readings.
Take Care
I dont mind offering usually I charge for these types of readings so I dont offer most of my services on here but your post had a particular calling to it and just lately I have been very much drawn to some certain readings.
Take Care
I read auras too. And frequently I see something different to the cameras view. But to understand why you really need to understand a bit about the actual cameras and what they measure, and then interpret into a picture.flight _of_angelwings wrote:Miss Em if you like just send me your photo via a pm and although I dont use a camera as my own vision is much cheaper and accurate I'd be only to happy to tell you whats going on with your aura. Your colour etc.
I do not understand though how when the colours of the aura are interpretated by the reader then how is it that each color in the photo means the very same thing? why also is it when two photos are taken directly after each other they see the exact opposite and the colours are no longer the same?
Personally I would rather go by vision still rather than a camera. we have some people around near home here and they charge huge amounts for the photos so as to cover the cost of buying the camera. the camera cost $15,000 so they charge 200 for a full spread sheet which is all computer generated. the computer just prints out the colors in your photo taken and what it 'can' mean. Seems everything is going to computers now.
Well thats just my opinion!
Miss Em if your interested just send a pic I'll use the aura and psychic intuition to tell you what your colors are and what colors you can wear to help balance out any imbalances regarding emotions or chakras etc.
Colour is very personal, many people interpret a colour to be one thing when other's will call it another. The video and still aura imaging cameras, use computer programs to 'read' the colours that the sensors have picked up. To get a truer reading you need a person, just like with all good readings
The aura is a living thing that responds to our emotions, knowledge, experiences and hormones lol. It changes every heart beat and can be seen to shimmer, vibrate and throb with each pulse. Our feelings and emotions can change in an instant and so do our auras, watch one when someone gets embarrassed or blushes or sees someone they fancy etc The change is instant and obvious. Some auras seem to close in tight around the body and others seem to spread out almost trying to reach the person they like.
I find that it is far easier to read auras from digi-cam pictures, than normal cameras, again due to the information that creates the picture:)
Fascinating subject.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 4:44 am
- Location: New Zealand
Aura Pics
Hi
What a wonderful topic!!!
I have always been fascinated by Aura photos, and thought I would join in.
I have had 4 Aura photos taken over the last 13 or so years, and am slowly learning and extending myself more in regards to seeing and understanding them.
The last time was about 9yrs ago, at a holistic health expo, and I decided that I wanted to experiment and see what the difference there was if I got two pictures taken one after the other, but on two different cameras.
The strangest thing was, that while they were both quite different, they both were very accurate, but in different ways.
While that may not make sense, this is my way of explaining it.
Different camera's are likely to work on different frequencies (when I spoke with the people who took the two photos I’m talking about they also said this), and therefore pick up different signals, (auras).
Likewise, the "focus" of what they picked up on was different, one seemed to be more aligned with where I was at physically and mentally; while the other seemed more linked with what was spiritually going on for me at the time.
I think you said Gem about needing a person to do the reading makes sense, especially if that person is very tuned in to themselves.
The reason I say that is because if someone is reading just from an Aura photo, that person would have to (at least initially) make some assumptions about which "frequencies" or Aspects the camera is picking up, where if they can see aura's themselves then they are likely to get a better interpretation.... for those of who you can do this ... would that be correct??
I'm keen to gain a better understanding of how to open myself up in regards to seeing Aura's, any advice?
What a wonderful topic!!!
I have always been fascinated by Aura photos, and thought I would join in.
I have had 4 Aura photos taken over the last 13 or so years, and am slowly learning and extending myself more in regards to seeing and understanding them.
The last time was about 9yrs ago, at a holistic health expo, and I decided that I wanted to experiment and see what the difference there was if I got two pictures taken one after the other, but on two different cameras.
The strangest thing was, that while they were both quite different, they both were very accurate, but in different ways.
While that may not make sense, this is my way of explaining it.
Different camera's are likely to work on different frequencies (when I spoke with the people who took the two photos I’m talking about they also said this), and therefore pick up different signals, (auras).
Likewise, the "focus" of what they picked up on was different, one seemed to be more aligned with where I was at physically and mentally; while the other seemed more linked with what was spiritually going on for me at the time.
I think you said Gem about needing a person to do the reading makes sense, especially if that person is very tuned in to themselves.
The reason I say that is because if someone is reading just from an Aura photo, that person would have to (at least initially) make some assumptions about which "frequencies" or Aspects the camera is picking up, where if they can see aura's themselves then they are likely to get a better interpretation.... for those of who you can do this ... would that be correct??
I'm keen to gain a better understanding of how to open myself up in regards to seeing Aura's, any advice?
BB
SilvaWitch
SilvaWitch
-
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: NSW, Australia
http://www.enchantedencounters.com/auras.htm
Try this site for some interesting information on auras and reading.
Try this site for some interesting information on auras and reading.
God bless, J
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:34 pm
- Reverend Dr
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:38 am
- Location: USA
-
- Posts: 7470
- Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 8:11 pm
- Location: N.A.
A question to all psychics who can see auras ...
This is a huge forum of thousands of members many of whom are psychics and can see auras.
Have any of you who can clearly see auric fields (aura) ever had a chance to look at an aura picture of an individual you know while comparing what the kirillian camera recorded with what you saw directly?
In other words, are there any differences between the aura photographs and direct visualizing of the aura [[of any given individual]]?
Please enlighten us (no pun intended!)
Rohiniranjan
Have any of you who can clearly see auric fields (aura) ever had a chance to look at an aura picture of an individual you know while comparing what the kirillian camera recorded with what you saw directly?
In other words, are there any differences between the aura photographs and direct visualizing of the aura [[of any given individual]]?
Please enlighten us (no pun intended!)
Rohiniranjan
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests