I have two questions to your reply
Q1: What if a planet is natural malefic (NM) but functional benefic (FB)? Does being FB override being NM?
What if we consider Cancer lagna. Mars is a functional benefic for the Cancer lagna but a natural malefic. In such a case, how does it work?
Will Mars give effect of benefic/malefic?
Q2: How to arrive at %age beneficity/maleficity?
One more thing: FOr a house signification we have to look at house lord, planets in the house and planets aspecting the house (SAY).
Now the house lord maybe well placed, there maybe malefics aspecting the house as well posited in the house.
In this case, how to say what %age of results will be benefic/malefic?
Thanks
Kiran
vivekvshetty wrote:Kiana Ji,
Are you sure you got it right?
A funtional malefic is a malefic for a particular chart because it is the lord of a malefic Bhaava.
This malefic influence is carried to the Bhaava it is placed in and aspects, to the Grahas it conjoins and aspects.
Suppose Mangal in the fourth Bhaava for a Kanyaa lagna Jaataka- it is a funtional malefic and also a natural Malefic. Its placement in the fourth will effect all the significations of the fourth (except the kaarakatwa of landed properties).
Its Drishti on the tenth Bhaava will vitiate the professional atmosphere for the native. Its Drishti on the seventh will influence the Marital aspect in a negative way.
Kirana Ji keep asking till you are satisfied with the reply, we dont mind -instead welcome it.
But remember we are not here to spoon feed but to trigger your own understanding, so most of the time a query from you may be answered by a counter question.
the pace of the course is slow because we want a solid grounding in the basics. For this we want participation from as many learners as possible. This will spur us on and keep us on our toes as well as enrich the course contents. This is sadly not the case here and except for a few, most of the learners are silent or not interested.
We want to keep the atmosphere here as informal as possible and hence we are not making answering the Questions posed at the end of each lesson compulsary. May be that is making learners complacent.
RishiRahul and vivekrkirana wrote:Oh yes, I got it now:
So significance of a house results from the position of its lord as one of the many factors. If the house is a malefic, then a strong position of the lord can result in malefic occurences and vice versa for benefic houses.
Now, a particular house significations would be affected by the lord of the house, by the lords of other houses that are present in it or occupying in it.
How do we arrive at a benefic/malefic result derivation for the house then.
Rishiji and Vivekji, Pls. let us know
vivekvshetty wrote:Namaskaar Kiran ji,rkirana wrote:Rishiji and Vivekji
Pls. respondrkirana wrote:Rishiji and Vivekji,
I am sorry - but I have not got an answer to my question.
I want to isolate effects on house due to house lord alone.
If house lord of a house is functional benefic, does it mean good things to the house from the house lord. If this is true it is vice-versa when we have functional malefics.
So in this case, is it good if dustana lords are functional malefics (so that they mean negative to significations of the dustana)?
My question is simple:
GIven that one of the signifcators of what a house signifies is the lord of the house, if the lord of the house is benefic (considering effects due to house lord alone), does it mean good for the house significations and vice versa?
You have turned the lesson topsy turvy.
The bhaava dictates whether the Lord is a Functional benefic or malefic. You are asking if it is the other way round.
The lord of a beneficial bhaava is a benefic for that chart and lord of a malefic bhaava is a malefic for that chart.
RishiRahul and vivek